Thursday, September 27, 2012

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Group Presentation

Each group MUST provide the class a one-page handout of your topic (submit that handout to me before presenting also and email as attachment).

PLEASE submit your reference list in Word file (by email) and in hard copy before you present. (I recommend you send a draft well before you present also). Your references should be on your PP, if you do a PP.

All groups must be prepared to go the first day, but email and claim first presenting slot if you want.

PRESENTATIONS MUST BE 16-20 MINS LONG (ONLY), AND YOU SHOULD BE FAMILIAR WITH THE TECHNOLOGY YOU USE BEFORE THE PRESENTATION.

Monday

(1) Single-sex education

(2) Corporal punishment

(3) Homeschooling

(4) Foreign Language

Midterm

Midterm; self-evaluation/course midterm feedback

***[Include by mid-term your four school choices for your virtual school assignment.]

Frame the discussion below between Cody (Social Context Reformer) and the Gates Foundation ("No Excuses" Reformers) within this: "Is Poverty Destiny?"

You need to submit TWO requirements for this midterm:

(1) DUE before class October 12, email me a list of 8-10 key talking points you plan to contribute to the class discussion in class that day. These talking points should grow from the discussion below and should pull together the entire first half of this semester (topic readings, supplemental reading [Kozol], tutoring, and class discussions).

(2) Also email before October 12 a self-evaluation (as attachment) of your learning and work throughout the semester so far. What have you learned? How have you been challenged? What have we not covered yet that you want us to cover? What has been the quality of your work and engagement in the course so far? Please assign yourself a letter grade for the course so far. Feel free to offer positive and critical feedback on the course and my teaching as well in order to insure the course fulfills your needs and expectations for the remainder of the semester.

Class discussion: Anthony Cody education reform debate with the Gates Foundation (GF):

Cody

(1) Dialogue With the Gates Foundation: How Do We Build the Teaching Profession?
(2) Responding to the Gates Foundation: How do we Consider Evidence of Learning in Teacher Evaluations?
(3) Dialogue with the Gates Foundation: Can Schools Defeat Poverty by Ignoring It?
(4) Dialogue With the Gates Foundation: What Is the Purpose of K-12 Education?
(5) The Dialogue With the Gates Foundation: What Happens When Profits Drive Reform?

GF

(1) The Gates Foundation Responds: How do we Build the Teaching Profession
(2) The Gates Foundation Writes: How Do We Consider Evidence of Student Learning in Teacher Evaluation?
(3) The Gates Foundation Responds: Poverty Does Matter--But It Is Not Destiny
(4) The Gates Foundation Writes: K-12 Education: An Opportunity Catalyst
(5) The Gates Foundation Responds: The Role of the Marketplace in Education

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Monday, September 17, 2012

Corridor of Shame and the deficit view of poverty

How does the documentary Corridor of Shame portray people and children in poverty?

Place the portrayal of poverty and people in poverty in the context of the following:

"Return of the Deficit," Curt Dudley-Marling

"The Myth of the Culture of Poverty," Paul Gorski

"No Excuses" and the Culture of Shame: Why Metrics Don't Matter

Friday, September 14, 2012

Change of Subject: Why teachers have test anxiety, too

Change of Subject: Why teachers have test anxiety, too

Lean Production: What’s Really Hurting Public Education | Jacobin

Lean Production: What’s Really Hurting Public Education | Jacobin

Daily Kos: Why you should care about what happens to the poor

Daily Kos: Why you should care about what happens to the poor

Daily Kos: On "Hostile Rhetoric," Laziness, and the Education Debate

Daily Kos: On "Hostile Rhetoric," Laziness, and the Education Debate

Midterm: Anthony Cody/ Gates Foundation Reform Dialogue

Midterm; self-evaluation/course midterm feedback

Class discussion: Anthony Cody education reform debate with the Gates Foundation (GF):

Cody

(1) Dialogue With the Gates Foundation: How Do We Build the Teaching Profession?
(2) Responding to the Gates Foundation: How do we Consider Evidence of Learning in Teacher Evaluations?
(3) Dialogue with the Gates Foundation: Can Schools Defeat Poverty by Ignoring It?
(4) Dialogue With the Gates Foundation: What Is the Purpose of K-12 Education?
(5) The Dialogue With the Gates Foundation: What Happens When Profits Drive Reform?

GF

(1) The Gates Foundation Responds: How do we Build the Teaching Profession
(2) The Gates Foundation Writes: How Do We Consider Evidence of Student Learning in Teacher Evaluation?
(3) The Gates Foundation Responds: Poverty Does Matter--But It Is Not Destiny
(4) The Gates Foundation Writes: K-12 Education: An Opportunity Catalyst
(5) The Gates Foundation Responds: The Role of the Marketplace in Education

The Great Lakes Center for Education Research and Practice

The Great Lakes Center for Education Research and Practice

Friday, September 7, 2012

Why All Ed Reform Fails | Alternet

Why All Ed Reform Fails | Alternet

Outing ACT: Test-and-Punish Doesn't Educate, but It's Profitable for Testing Companies

Outing ACT: Test-and-Punish Doesn't Educate, but It's Profitable for Testing Companies

Kliebard, Herbert M. (2004). The Struggle for the American Curriculum, 1893–1958 (3rd ed.). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

Kliebard, Herbert M. (2004). The Struggle for the American Curriculum, 1893–1958 (3rd ed.). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

Education Review-a journal of book reviews
Kliebard devotes the bulk of his book to describing four relatively stable and distinct “interest groups” that competed over seven decades for control of the schools through the curriculum. Humanists embraced “the systematic development of reasoning power” (p. 9) as well as the Western cultural heritage. Developmentalists “proceeded basically from the assumption that the natural order of development in the child was the most significant and scientifically defensible basis for determining what should be taught” (p. 11). Social efficiency educators wanted schools to employ the “scientific management” techniques of supervision, accountability, precise measurement, and efficiency and to differentiate education according to students’ perceived needs, abilities, and probable life courses. Social meliorists wanted to use schooling as a lever for societal progress.

Bias in the SAT?

Bias in the SAT?

New Evidence of Racial Bias on SAT | Inside Higher Ed

New Evidence of Racial Bias on SAT | Inside Higher Ed

Why Scotland's approach to publicly funded education works | Education | The Guardian

Why Scotland's approach to publicly funded education works | Education | The Guardian